2026-11-03 19:13 UTC
Replies (17)
-
@joeschmoe@lemmy.world 2026-11-04 03:14
Ah yes, the “AIs” that are still basically glorified text prediction are definitely “smarter”.
-
@mycodesucks@lemmy.world 2026-11-03 21:56
He’s appealing to the huge swathes of the public who have absolutely NO idea how to actually identify intelligence. It’s actually difficult enough where the stupidest people can’t figure it out, and they use confidence, volume, wealth, and flowery language as a proxy. Even when you do get people to accept that information is an important part, ANOTHER huge swath of people don’t understand the difference between information and intelligence. In short, there’s a very small part of the population that can even IDENTIFY what an intelligent person looks like, so he gets away with this.
-
@kat_angstrom@lemmy.world 2026-11-04 03:26
Now, lately. Specifically, recently. Totally particularly it happened on a certain date. Much wow
-
@nonentity@sh.itjust.works 2026-11-04 03:44
‘Artificial Intelligence’ is, and always has been since the term was conjured in 1956, a marketing term for a pseudoscience. Anyone who is impressed by the function, or output, of a LLM, to the level they believe it is in any way adjacent to intelligence, must be quarantined from the decision making processes of systems which affect anyone not similarly cognitively impaired.
-
@fritobugger2017@lemmy.world 2026-11-04 03:53
Proper headline for anytime Altman and Musk make some statement: “Sociopath with too much money makes ridiculous claim.”
-
@f314@lemmy.world 2026-11-03 22:21
Is it because he thinks he is the brightest human scientist, but it turns out he’s actually pretty stupid?
-
@canttakeitwithyou@lemmy.zip 2026-11-04 04:20
If Sam believes that, will he replace himself with AI and retire already? Pretty please? … It’s so easy to catch the ultra-rich in their lies; they simply can’t be bothered to speak believably.
-
@IamLost@lemmy.world 2026-11-04 04:27
These types of people don’t know the difference between having an answer and understanding. It’s why when AI solves a long running math problem, it’s practically useless to us.
-
@Daft_ish@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2026-11-04 04:34
Would like to try his account
-
@eicker@lemmy.world 2026-11-03 19:14
Funny how AI has supposedly surpassed the greatest scientists, yet the greatest scientific discovery here is always announced by the guy selling subscriptions. If it really is that smart, perhaps it could explain to Sam the difference between a peer reviewed breakthrough and a product launch.
-
@SW42@lemmy.world 2026-11-04 04:51
Please Sam, put the AI in charge of your company. Pretty please
-
@iampivot@lemmy.world 2026-11-04 05:08
If the AI is so smart, why does they have to train it?
-
@Tattorack@lemmy.world 2026-11-04 05:18
AI is a deep learning algorithm used for information retrieval with dubious accuracy. It doesn’t think. It has no awareness or understanding. It’s not intelligent. It certainly can’t come up with something new or creative like an intelligent person can.
-
@nomecks@lemmy.wtf 2026-11-05 03:23
My excavator is the strongest person!
-
@SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 2026-11-04 15:12
yo Sam…give one single example where any scientist can solve anything without new data generated by experimentation done in a lab by people. The idea that a “super intelligence” will cure diseases is a an ignorant view of drug discovery. AI is being trained on mostly experimental failures and mostly poor experimental design in poor model systems for human disease. You can only polish a turd so hard.
-
@rustydrd@sh.itjust.works 2026-11-03 22:46
If it’s so smart, maybe they should ask it to come up with a viable business strategy, because he sure as hell hasn’t figured it out, lol.
-
@CluelessCalls@lemmy.world 2026-11-05 05:53
Is that sister fucking Sam Altman?