2026-10-18 07:48 UTC
Replies (3)
-
@rpbook@gts.phillipsuk.org 2026-10-18 08:19
@Damiano_Chech@techhub.social @RadicalGraffiti@todon.eu the point is, you can't claim to love or respect trans people and also proudly state your love for Harry Potter. https://www.tillystranstuesdays.com/2026/10/13/terfs-part-3-no-ethical-consumption-of-harry-potter/
-
@Wuzzy@cyberplace.social 2026-10-18 14:04
@Damiano_Chech@techhub.social @RadicalGraffiti@todon.eu If "Harry Potter" would just be the fictional character, nobody would give a shit. The problem is, it’s a BRAND. It’s the name of a media empire on which Rowling sits on top and earns royalties for basically everything. And she’s one of the worst transphobes. She uses her wealth to spread anti-trans propaganda + lobby for laws that discriminate trans people. This is all documented. Look it up. Frankly, the Harry Potter media empire can go EAT SHIT. I’m cis btw.
-
@canleaf@mastodon.social 2026-10-22 10:04
@Damiano_Chech@techhub.social @RadicalGraffiti@todon.eu no, not even used. Pirated. Search other heroes.